Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essay on Digital India

Digital India  is a campaign to ensure the government services are available to all the citizens of this country electronically through increasing internet connectivity and improved online infrastructure or by making the citizens of this country empowered (digitally) in the field of technology. This campaign was launched on 1 of July 2015 by the government of India under the rule of Prime Minister- Narendra Modi with a motto of – “Power to Empower”. It holds/provides an important aspect to the other key schemes of India, such as  Make in India  , BharatNet,  Standup India  , Industrial corridors, Startup India, Sagarmala, UDAN-RCS, Bharatmala and Dedicated Freight Corridors. The main aim of this initiative is to connect rural areas with high-speed internet connectivity and increase digital literacy. This campaign comes under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and is led by Ravi Shankar Prasad and P.P. Chaudhary. Essay ...
Read more

Unconscious Bias of Australian Selectors

If we assume for a moment that the Australian selectors are making decisions that they consider the best for Australian cricket, and not merely to piss me off (and I am not yet convinced of this argument, but anyway), I wonder whether there is an unconscious bias towards batsmen. Recently, Australian cricket has been plagued by batting collapses, and an underperforming middle order. North and Hussey in particular have been considered by most judges (other than the selectors) to be under pressure to hold their places for over 12 months. However, in spite of losing our last three tests, the only change (other than the return from injury by Haddin) that appears likely for the first Test is the dropping of Hauritz (and potentially Bollinger evidently). While I don't think Hauritz should be anywhere near our national team, why is a bowler the sole victim of our recent poor form? Haurie's form against India was crap, but he was actually better than expected last summer. Why does his ...
Read more

The History of Chucking - Part II

Apologies to all - I have been both unwell and away recently. I will endeavour to make up for the significant length of time since my last posting. ____________________________________________ In 1947, the law makers finally made the logical decision to combine Law 10 and Law 48. These were re-written as Law 26: �For a delivery to be fair the ball must be bowled, not thrown or jerked; if either umpire be not entirely satisfied of the absolute fairness of a delivery in this respect, he shall call and signal �no-ball� instantly upon delivery�. This change seemed to simplify the situation, and for the next decade there were few problems with chuckers in world cricket. However, the mid to late 50s saw a sudden explosion of bowlers with very suspect actions. The various administrators around the world experimented and trialed many different wordings and interpretations for the throwing law, but none seemed to be ideal. Precisely what defined a throw was proving difficult to put into...
Read more